| |
Posted in Drivers, F1 Championship, F1 History, Felipé Massa, Ferrari, Formula 1, Kimi Raikkonen, Michael Schumacher, Motor Racing, Ron Dennis, The future on January 12th, 2007
Toyota unveiled their T107 today and talked a great deal about the changes they have made and their hopes for the coming season. But a rash of news from Ferrari overshadows the Toyota hype and paves the way for the Italian team’s launch of their new car on Sunday. It’s almost too much information.
On the driver front, the paparazzi are already pursuing Raikkonen and managed to get a photo of him downing a glass of white wine. Well dang, can’t he wait for the champagne on the podium? It’s all a bit silly, of course, and Kimi has been settling in pretty well at his new team, enjoying the friendly atmosphere and firing off a few retaliatory shots at his former boss in response to Ron Dennis’ criticisms.
Massa seems to be enjoying all the attention and has had quite a lot to say, putting Michael Schumacher in the frame for a testing role, only to have Stefano Domenicali, Ferrari sporting director, haul him out again. Apparently the Brazilian is getting along fine with Raikkonen but admits that he will be one of his toughest challengers for the championship.
Apart from their driver line-up, the team are still sorting out just who will do what in the coming season. Michael keeps being mentioned for all sorts of jobs but will probably not attend many GPs, and Mario Almondo might miss a few as well. He is not a straight swap for Ross Brawn, apparently, and much of the immediate decision making will be made by Luca Baldisseri.
It all sounds strangely familiar, rather like the Ferrari of old, when battles for control of various aspects of policy and strategy absorbed most of the team’s energy. Everyone is smiling now but methinks I hear the sound of knives being sharpened. Oh, Montezemolo, what have you done?
Finally, there is news of the cars’ livery to be revealed on Sunday; there will be more white and the red will fade a little to resemble their Marlboro sponsor’s more orangey shade. White on a Ferrari? Now that is bad news for the commentators - does no-one remember how they used to be confused with the Dallaras and vice versa when their cars had a lot of white on them? Ah well, at least the Spykers will be orange…
Posted in Advertising, Drivers, F1 Championship, F1 History, Formula 1, Gilles Villeneuve, Michael Schumacher, Motor Racing, Race Strategy, The future, Walter Rohrl, Young drivers on January 2nd, 2007
Former rally champion, Walter Rohrl, reckons that the end of Michael Schumacher’s career as a driver will be good for all forms of motor sport. He points out that, in the last few years, advertisers have lined up to have even a tiny decal on Michael’s car, rather than use the same money to sponsor an entire rally car.
Michael in the office
For those of us primarily interested in F1, it has been easy to overlook Michael’s influence beyond our favorite sport. If Rohrl is relieved to see him go, the ripples of Michael’s success must have reached way beyond our limited horizons. And I can believe that he is right; the Schumacher years changed F1 itself to such an extent that it is only logical that the effects should have spilled over into other areas.
Michael was both good and bad for F1. In becoming a household name, he attracted many more viewers, come to see what all the fuss was about, and this automatically brought the advertisers clamoring for a piece of the pie. But his domination of the sport also raised the most common criticism of the races: that they were predictable and boring as a result. For those of us who became fed up with the same guy winning all the time, the only enjoyment left to us was the hope that someone, somehow, would beat the blighter.
It is a danger that always threatens F1. In the past there have been flashes of domination by a driver or a team that have hinted at the boredom of such a situation. The total domination of Mercedes in the mid-1950s, Jim Clark’s succession of wins in the Lotus 25, Chapman’s Lotus 79 in 1978 and the swapping of dominant years between McLaren and Williams in the 1980s and 1990s were examples of how F1 races can become foregone conclusions.
What saved us in those years was that the boredom never lasted too long. Mercedes got out after a couple of years, Clark was always subject to the fragility of the Lotus, Chapman’s designs after the 79 were not as effective as others’ and neither Williams nor McLaren could achieve total dominance for long. Michael’s reign, however, just seems to have gone on and on.
So F1 breathes a sigh of relief to see Michael go. Suddenly there are new stars in the shape of Alonso and Raikkonen and a hoste of young bloods eager to make their names. This is what makes for great racing years: uncertainty as to who will win, real battles between several drivers and cars, the championship won by a point or two.
Already the advertisers spread out and begin to hedge their bets. McLaren and Renault find new sponsors and even lesser teams such as Spyker manage to attract good money. Perhaps Rohrl is correct in assuming that some of the money will go to rallying - and that has to be good for all motor sport.
Not that Michael is really to blame for all this; the object is to win and, if he proved the most complete racer for ten years, succeeding as a driver, politician, strategist and team builder, he was only doing his job. But F1 loves the real racer, the guy who fights through adversity, doesn’t always win but gives his all in the battle and cares nothing for the politics and strategy - hence the enormous popularity of Gilles Villeneuve and the fans’ preference for the skill and courage of Senna over the clinical approach and carefully planned races of Prost.
F1 might lose a bit of advertising revenue in the coming years - there are no obvious stars that will dominate in Schumacher style and the household will have to deal with several names rather than just one. But the health of the sport will improve immensely. Big names may attract new viewers but it’s competition that keeps them.
Posted in F1 Championship, Ferrari, Formula 1, Jean Todt, Kimi Raikkonen, Michael Schumacher, Mika Hakkinen, Motor Racing, Ross Brawn, The future on December 23rd, 2006
Once again, Ferrari has affirmed that Michael Schumacher will be closely involved with the team, even when he is not present at the race. This time, it’s their technical director, Mario Almondo, making the announcement.
The Triumvirate, Brawn, Todt and Schumacher
It all sounds wonderful, with Michael supplied with a remote connection to the team for instant communication, a big office at HQ for the man and even a role for him as talent scout at karting events. Well, okay, the karting is new but haven’t we heard all the rest before? Isn’t it a case of “methinks the lady (in red) doth protest too much”?
What this constant repetition and confirmation of Michael’s position within the team does tell us is that Ferrari too is a bit nervous about the coming season. For years they have relied on “the dream team” to deliver the results and suddenly it is broken and scattered. Who can blame them for wondering whether success has departed with the mighty three, Schumacher, Todt and Brawn?
So they cover their fears with frequent declarations that nothing has changed, Michael and Todt are still on board, even though in different roles, and the red machine will roll smoothly on into the future. It’s themselves they’re trying to convince, not us.
It is apparent too that Ferrari has begun to have doubts about Kimi’s suitability for the team. Last week he was promised a talking-to about his offtrack behaviour, this week we are given the promise that he will smile a lot more. Now there’s one that might not be so easy to deliver, and I’m not even sure I want to see what the frozen-faced Finn’s smile looks like. We are so used to the flat delivery of the men from the land of lakes and forests, after all.
My theory is that it’s not so much that the Finns have absorbed the icy nature of their homeland but rather that their language produces the deadpan, passionless sound that we hear when they speak English. We call them the icemen but in reality they are as passionate as anyone else - it just doesn’t come across that way when they speak a tongue foreign to them. Remember Mika Hakkinen’s despair and tears when he threw away an Italian Grand Prix through a silly mistake?
And now Ferrari wants Kimi to smile. Pardon me for saying so, but there is implied criticism of their new employee in that idea. And that is hardly the way to welcome your new hope for the future.
All signs of nervousness in the Ferrari camp. If I were to wish them well (and I don’t - you know I’m backing Button for 2007), I’d tell them that we already know that Michael will continue in an advisory role and just to get on with it. But as for Kimi, my advice would be to leave the poor guy alone; give him the car and he’ll produce the goods - who cares about his public persona if he’s the fastest man on the track?
Buy Ferrari gear at our F1 Store
Posted in Adrian Sutil, Christijan Albers, Colin Kolles, Drivers, F1 Championship, Formula 1, Michael Schumacher, Motor Racing, Robert Kubica, Spyker, The future, Tiago Monteiro, Young drivers on December 21st, 2006
Colin Kolles has announced the signing of young German driver, Adrian Sutil, to be Spyker teammate to Christijan Albers in 2007. This is slightly surprising, since most had expected that Tiago Monteiro would continue as Spyker’s second driver.
Tiago Monteiro in the Spyker
But it does tie in with the sudden fashion for giving rookie drivers a chance. With Lewis Hamilton at McLaren, Robert Kubica at BMW, Heikki Kovalainen at Renault, Anthony Davidson at Super Aguri, and now Sutil at Spyker, F1 is filled with fresh new faces. I cannot recall a previous season in which so many first-time F1 racers entered the sport.
There are two reasons for this, I think. Clearly, the instant success of Robert Kubica at BMW made team managers realize that there were discoveries to be made within the ranks of hopefuls graduating from F3 and GP2. As the GP2 Champion of 2006, Hamilton was an obvious pick but there were others who seemed just as talented. Two who made it into test driver seats are Sebastian Vettel and Gary Paffett, both of whom look to be just as quick as any of the new drivers.
And then there came the retirement of Michael Schumacher. Somehow his disappearance has created a lot of space in F1 and allowed teams to be more adventurous in their choice of drivers. It may well be that memories of Michael’s debut at Spa in 1991 were stirred and the hunt for the next Schumacher has started. The weight of expectation falls heavily on the shoulders of Hamilton and Kubica but the others too will be watched closely for signs of greatness.
Every year we hope for a really good season to come but the changes and shake-ups of 2006 point to a fascinating 2007. So many imponderables have been thrown into the mix that there are bound to be surprises in the forthcoming races. Out with the old, in with the new!
So how good is Adrian Sutil? He finished second to Hamilton in Formula 3 Euroseries in 2005 but otherwise his reputation rests on the potential he showed in his few tests for MF1/Spyker this year. Colin Kolles has made it clear that he was impressed by Sutil’s performance and that is why he was given the nod over Monteiro.
Personally, I applaud Spyker’s decision. Monteiro is a known quantity and the team have nothing to lose and everything to gain by letting Sutil have a go. Albers is competent enough to ensure that the Spyker car will at least achieve its potential and Sutil offers the possibility that it might do even more.
It all adds up to a great season to come. I don’t know about you, but I can hardly wait.
| |