<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the Australian GP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.formula1latest.com/2007/03/19/thoughts-on-the-australian-gp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.formula1latest.com/2007/03/19/thoughts-on-the-australian-gp/</link>
	<description>Formula 1 Motor Racing News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:50:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive</title>
		<link>http://www.formula1latest.com/2007/03/19/thoughts-on-the-australian-gp/comment-page-1/#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formula1latest.com/2007/03/19/thoughts-on-the-australian-gp/#comment-1612</guid>
		<description>Ron Dennis has denied that it was strategy, pointing at the fact that Hamilton was delayed by traffic on the crucial laps.  Of course, that doesn&#039;t say anything about whether they &lt;em&gt;would&lt;/em&gt; have delayed Hamilton a bit if other cars hadn&#039;t already done it for them.  Personally, I think that the team would have made sure somehow that Alonso get the second place behind Raikkonen - it just makes more sense to put your money on the proven champ rather than a rookie, no matter how good he is.  It&#039;s a long season and Hamilton will make his mistakes along the way - in fact, he &lt;em&gt;did&lt;/em&gt; make a couple in the Australian GP but they were recoverable.  Future ones might not be.

Alonso, however, makes his mistakes with what he says after the race and rarely puts a foot wrong when it really matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Dennis has denied that it was strategy, pointing at the fact that Hamilton was delayed by traffic on the crucial laps.  Of course, that doesn&#8217;t say anything about whether they <em>would</em> have delayed Hamilton a bit if other cars hadn&#8217;t already done it for them.  Personally, I think that the team would have made sure somehow that Alonso get the second place behind Raikkonen &#8211; it just makes more sense to put your money on the proven champ rather than a rookie, no matter how good he is.  It&#8217;s a long season and Hamilton will make his mistakes along the way &#8211; in fact, he <em>did</em> make a couple in the Australian GP but they were recoverable.  Future ones might not be.</p>
<p>Alonso, however, makes his mistakes with what he says after the race and rarely puts a foot wrong when it really matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan M</title>
		<link>http://www.formula1latest.com/2007/03/19/thoughts-on-the-australian-gp/comment-page-1/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formula1latest.com/2007/03/19/thoughts-on-the-australian-gp/#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>Do you think the pit strategy was team ordered or is still too early for that?  Alonzo is the more likely candidate to win the championship</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think the pit strategy was team ordered or is still too early for that?  Alonzo is the more likely candidate to win the championship</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive</title>
		<link>http://www.formula1latest.com/2007/03/19/thoughts-on-the-australian-gp/comment-page-1/#comment-1594</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formula1latest.com/2007/03/19/thoughts-on-the-australian-gp/#comment-1594</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think luck came into it, Mad.  Alonso is as good at tactics as he is at driving - he chose the right moment to re-fuel.  But you may get your wish anyway; if Hamilton is this good straight away, how good will he be after a few more races...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think luck came into it, Mad.  Alonso is as good at tactics as he is at driving &#8211; he chose the right moment to re-fuel.  But you may get your wish anyway; if Hamilton is this good straight away, how good will he be after a few more races&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad</title>
		<link>http://www.formula1latest.com/2007/03/19/thoughts-on-the-australian-gp/comment-page-1/#comment-1593</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formula1latest.com/2007/03/19/thoughts-on-the-australian-gp/#comment-1593</guid>
		<description>Go Hamilton! He was unlucky to lose second place to Alonso.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Hamilton! He was unlucky to lose second place to Alonso.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

